Minutes of January meeting
WESTSIDE RESOURCE CONSERVATION DISTRICT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Draft Meeting Minutes
January 15th, 2009
The
following is a summary of the Westside Resource Conservation District
Board of Directors special meeting held on January 15th 2009, at the
Westlands Water District Five Points office.
President
Phil Erro convened the meeting at 10:10AM. A quorum was present and the
agenda was found in order. Staff circulated a sign-up sheet that is
attached and a part of these minutes. A copy of the draft minutes of
the December meeting were posted on the web site and transmitted to the
Directors for review. On a motion by Director Clausen seconded by
Director Finster the minutes were unanimously approved as submitted.
There were no public comments.
Under
financial report, the Manager outlined the current financial condition
of the District. At this time there was the ability to address some of
the payables. The proposed payables list was presented to Finance
Committee Chair Director Clausen. Based on the income received,
Director Clausen moved to issue the warrants submitted. The motion was
seconded by Director Diener and then unanimously approved.
Under
the “President’s Corner” of the Director reports President Erro
presented several items. He announced that now that we had the
web site for posting current information, the minutes of this meeting
and all future meetings would be posted to the site within one week of
the meeting. He also indicated that the IFDM manuals, the “annual
plans” and numerous links were available on the site. Finally, the
agenda would be posted to the web site at least one week before the
meetings.
The
next item President Erro presented was the summary elements and
implementation effort of the IFDM program the District sponsors. The
program needs more effective communication because it could be an
important component of the Westlands effort to exchange responsibility
for drainage management from the United States Bureau of Reclamation
for water supply reliability. IFDM is the only salt management strategy
that has the capability to meet the current stringent regulatory
controls imposed on drainage water management. The problem originates
from both the natural salt accumulation of
evapo-transpiration/evapo-concentration and importation of salt in CVP
irrigation water. President Erro discussed the measurement units and
methods for evaluating salt in water and soil. The main assessment tool
is electrical conductivity which then can be roughly calculated into
the salt components. The most significant salt constituents are sodium
and chloride ions. The IFDM process manages water tables with precision
water application and drainage systems. Precision irrigation minimizes
the amount of water that has to be drained in a specific field and
precise sub-surface drainage design minimizes the amount of both
applied and regional drainage water that has to be managed by the
system. Current IFDM systems succeed by growing the highest return
crops on at the largest amount of areas possible before using drainage
water for irrigating ever more salt tolerant plant materials before
finally sending concentrated brine to a solar evaporator. Both the
drainage areas and solar evaporator are subject to regulatory controls
but the highest levels of controls are on the evaporator. This is
especially true where some drainage waters can contain small amounts of
ionic selenium species, particularly selenate. Selenium in relatively
low concentrations is a toxicant to avian and other terrestrial animal
species. The key management element is to have no standing water in
drainage re-cycling areas or in the solar evaporator system. Some IFDM
systems are three-stage and others are four. Three stage have
high-value crops, re-cycling of drainage on salt-tolerant plants and
the solar evaporator. A fourth stage adds an element of blending the
first re-cycled drainage water with fresh water to grow cereal, tree or
forage crops that have a potential significant economic return for the
grower. The IFDM activities are incrementally expanding but we
need to promote the technology to get better adoption and acceptance as
an on-going viable solution.
Under
Director reports, Director Diener gave an update on the design and
technology involved in the Forever Water distillation unit that will be
featured at the next Board meeting. This technology will be evaluated
and compared to reverse osmosis (RO) for efficacy and cost. RO still
has the issue of calcium (in drainage water) fouling and the need for
pre-treatment or high membrane maintenance costs. One potential
difference with adding the distiller that Director Diener has
identified is that by distilling the drain water instead of doing some
of the re-cycling the ratio of productive farmland goes up from 40/640
for drainage management to just 3 acres for a distiller and solar
evaporator with 637 acres available for high-value crops. Next,
Director Brughelli talked about the almond field day he attended that
discussed pest management and husbandry practices that minimized use of
chemical treatments. Some of the tested practices have shown promise
and wider adoption while others have perhaps less success. The field
trials were done at Locke properties near Firebaugh. The trials were
modeled after the sustainable cotton trials developed a few years
ago. Issues for almond production that remain as high priority
that need further assessment include; aflotoxins for food safety, navel
orange worm, band canker and dormant spray use.
Finally,
President Erro mentioned Director Anderson was attending the range
water quality seminar and he would attend the Lorman seminar on San
Joaquin Valley groundwater conditions to be held in Fresno.
Under
the Manager’s report the “Annual Plan” was presented by the manager on
a motion by the Director Clausen seconded by Director Brughelli the
plans for watershed management, salt and drainage and habitat
restoration were approved.
There were no further reports and the meeting was adjourned unanimously at 11:55AM.
Sargeant J.
Green, Secretary-Manager