WESTSIDE RESOURCE CONSERVATION DISTRICT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Draft Meeting Minutes
January 21st, 2010
Call to Order:
President Phil Erro called the meeting to order at 1:20 PM. The following people attended:
Directors: President Erro, Gene Brughelli, Jorgen Clausen, John Diener and Craig Finster.
Others: Manager Sarge Green, Ken Johnson, DWR and Jim
Cooper, Red Rock IFDM Consultant.
Agenda and Minutes
A
quorum was present and the Board members present unanimously found the
agenda adequate for the meeting. Director Diener moved we accept the
December 16th, 2009 meeting minutes; the motion was seconded by
Director Brughelli and approved unanimously.
Public Comments:
There were no public comments.
Reports:
Financial
Report; the manager presented the following. The current bank statement
was available for review and inasmuch there was not sufficient funds to
make payments, the payables would need to be carried over to the next
meeting in anticipation of a receivable arriving from DWR. Therefore
the Board took no action on the financial report.
Director
Reports; President Erro outlined the current status of our Directors
terms and the vacancies. He passed around copies of the application for
appointment by the Board of Supervisors in lieu of an election in
November 2010. The vacancies include some that will expire in 2012 and
the others in 2014. The Directors present who need to be re-appointed
were asked to fill out the application and the supplement required by
the County Board. For the other Directors who were not in attendance,
President Erro intended to meet with them personally to obtain their
application if they were inclined to continue serving the District.
The
next Directors’ report item was the possible consolidation of RCD’s.
President Erro summarized the earlier efforts through LAFCO including
who was involved. For instance, under the LAFCO municipal service
review Panoche, Poso, Firebaugh, James and Tranquillity RCD’s were recommended to
seek the possibility of consolidation. Panoche, Poso and James
declined. Tranquillity adopted a consolidation resolution with our
District when it was discovered that our Board had fallen below the
Director threshold needed to take action (prompting the need for the
activity outlined above) postponing the consolidation effort. President
Erro then reviewed the value of the consolidation with Tranquillity.
One particular value is the joint need to explore water supply
reliability and flood management. The manager mentioned that later in
the agenda he would present the outline of the five-year update of
District goals and that water supply reliability was becoming the
highest priority for land operators in the District therefore water
supply using flood water and shallow salinized groundwater would be a
new activity along with sustaining our efforts for rangeland watershed
management, upland habitat restoration and drainage and salt
management. Working with the area of Tranquillity RCD would give both
Districts more options for the water supply and flood management
activities. President Erro wanted to make sure the Directors present
were comfortable with the proposal. In response, Director Diener
expressed a strong desire to move forward with water supply
opportunities using flood water and shallow groundwater as a District
effort and was supportive of combining with Tranquillity to that end.
He proposed adoption of a Resolution (2010-01 attached and made a part
of these minutes) to express the position of the Board to consolidate
with Tranquillity and work together on all the issues of common
interest and especially those discussed in this meeting.
The
next item under Director’s reports was brought to the attention of the
Board by Director Diener. The issue was California Government Code
Section 1090, also known as the “contract” conflict of interest
section. Most conflict issues are covered under the Fair Political
Practices Commission. However, this government code section comes under
the jurisdiction of the CA Attorney General. The problem outlined by
Director Diener was that the prohibition of Directors participating in
contracts is applied broadly without discretion for circumstances such
as for experiments and research such as at Red Rock Ranch. He believed
that since RCD’s are an instrument of the USDA and the Farm Bill that
an exemption should be sought from the State 1090 provisions when there
is no true financial gain for the person participating in the contract.
In the instant case, water from an experimental treatment system to be
used on Red Rock Ranch constituted a strict 1090 conflict for the
owners and operators of Red Rock whereas under federal rules the only
impact would be for the Director in question to abstain from any
similar contract award decisions. Director Diener sought a Board
Resolution that would allow the Directors to be governed by federal
rules not the stricter State conflict rules. If need be, the District
should seek County Counsel’s assistance in determining such a
Resolution could be adopted by the Board. The point being that there is
no financial gain from the example, it is research on the viability of
the treatment system. The water used would have been supplied to a crop
one way or the other any way as a matter of doing business. Director
Diener requested the matter be brought back to the Board in February.
Manager’s
Report; Sarge Green brought forth an outline of the next Five-year plan
and re-visited the earlier discussion of how he proposed that water
supply reliability be added to the existing programs and goals.
Directors requested he follow-up on two other items. One was about the
participation of BLM in the watershed especially related to invasive
species and the possible construction of a new special public access
areas in the Los Gatos Creek upper watershed area. Also, a follow-up
was in order with the Bureau of Reclamation on the upland habitat area
near Tranquillity.
Under Partner reports, Ken Johnson of
the CA Department of Water Resources summarized the current suite of
projects under way and anticipated on drainage and salt management.
The meeting was adjourned at 2:30 PM unanimously by the Directors present.
Sarge Green, Secretary-Manager